I read a post this morning on Nashville is Talking that led me to this great post by Bob Krumm. It got me to thinking about how the way the school system is today, has failed my daughter.
Megs is a very smart girl, and that’s not just a mother saying that. I’m completely honest with myself about what abilities my children have.
Aaron is slightly above average as far as intelligence- school is fairly easy to him, he brings home good grades. Aaron’s gift is his ability to get along socially. People like Aaron. Aaron knows how to fit in, how to get along.
Nate, well, I haven’t really placed where Nate’s at on the intelligence scale. Nate has been behind on many developmental milestones. He caught up with therapy, and now he seems pretty average. Nate can remember and sing (on key, even) songs he’s heard once or twice, so I think Nate’s talents may lie in music. He also likes to take things apart and put them together, and he loves to count, so he might be an engineer type. I don’t know.
But Megs, oh, Megs. She’s another story entirely. She’s a really good artist. She taught herself to read when she was 4 years old because I told her she had to be able to read to play some of the video games the rest of us were playing. So she just, somehow, figured it out and can read nearly anything anyone else can read. Megs also loves math. Often we’ll be driving in the car and we’ll be talking about addition and multiplication. Megs, like me, loves that you can take numbers and use a certain method and it comes out into one nice, neat package.
Yesterday we were driving down the road and she said, “One hundred plus ten plus ten is….one hundred twenty?” My heart lept up as I thought about how she really loves learning. Last year she went to preschool in Murfreesboro and she absolutely could not wait to go to school.
This year, she cries every morning she has to go to school and claims she’s sick. She’s not sick, she just hates school. I had tried to get her into the magnet school, but she didn’t “win the lottery”. So she had to go to the regular school that we are zoned for.
The school we are zoned for has a lot of problems. It has way more students than the building can hold, so there are many classes out in trailers. It has a 12% ESL population, and there aren’t enough teachers who can teach ESL, so these students are scattered throughout classes. In Meghan’s class of 22 students, 6 of those are ESL.
Now, I know the conservative types are going to tell me that’s my own damn fault for living in a poor area, and I suppose they’re right- this is one of the reasons we are moving back to Murfreesboro, to get my children in better school districts.
But even when we get the kids into better school districts, they still are not going to get the kind of education they really *need*, because the educational system in America is falling apart. There’s not enough money, there aren’t enough teachers, parents don’t care, or they care too much and fight to get their children into classes they really don’t need to be in.
I have a bold proposal to make, and it probably won’t be popular. I think we should tear down the school system the way it is and rebuild completely. Here’s what I would do.
In kindergarten through 3rd grade, students should be tested at the beginning and end of the year. This way, we can place students that are on a similar level of need. This would be a lot like the “reading groups” most of us had back when we were in school, only it would be for everything. I was placed in the “smart reading group”, but there were no math groups. If I had been able to be in the “smart reading group” and the “dumb math group”, I wonder if my math skills would be better today. Like I said earlier in the post, I *like* math. I just struggle with it.
Also, students would take general classes like music, art, etc- but they would be able to take one “enrichment” class of their choice, like languages, orchestra, choir. I do not think that children who are as young as kindergarten are unable to learn to speak a language, or read and play actual music. I think it is easier when you are younger.
This would work generally the same way for students in each grade following, but classes get more intensive, and more work is expected to be done at home. Once the student hits high school, classes get way more specialized and tailored to the student’s interests and abilities. High school would become more like vocational school- you could walk out of high school and have the training to become a mechanic, a hair dresser, etc.
Now, let’s talk about parental involvement. This is something I’ve rolled around in my mind many times and have not really been able to come up with a good solution. The fact is, parents absolutely *have* to take control of their children and insist that they behave in school, do their homework, etc. But some parents just do not. I’ve thought about fining parents for not making sure their children behave, but you can’t get money out of people that just don’t have it.
I’ve thought about kicking those kids out of the regular schools and sending them to alternative schools which are more like weekday jails for bad kids. This comes closer to a good idea, I think, but sometimes kids are good at heart and just have bad parents and feel they have to act out for attention. So I don’t know. This is the hole in my plan that I think is otherwise pretty good.
So, that’s my basic idea for how I’d like schools to run. There’s a lot more to it than this, but that’s the basics of it. What do you guys think? How would you fix the educational system?
























January 8, 2007 at 1:27 pm
That just sucks, Ivy. I’m so sorry about this. And I totally feel Megs’ pain. There was a discussion along these lines spawned in another city that I wrote pretty extensively about my own similar experience in the ’70s (before there was much in the way of “gifted programs” or “magnet schools”), I’ll have to see if I can dig it up and post or rewrite.
But the basic bottom line is that for a few early years, the school system I was in separated me and a few others from the rest of our class because we were so far ahead, then eventually they folded us back in and for the next eight or nine years of school, I was not challenged, got stuck waiting for others to catch up constantly, and grew to dislike and be totally bored with school ever after, even thru college. I hope maybe Megs will have the chance to turn it around the way I never did. There wasn’t much choice for me with small town public school.
I’ll try to dig up what I wrote before, it’s a little more clear and explanatory… hugs to Miss Megs, I know just how she feels.
January 8, 2007 at 1:27 pm
Ivy - I went to a school just like that - elementary thru high school. Public - in South Carolina no less. Lexington County. Hearing about the school system here in Tennessee is just terrifying…
January 8, 2007 at 1:36 pm
I love your idea! I’d take it even further and get rid of age-based grades in the traditional K-5 ranges; a child is promoted as soon as they are ready to move up. It should be a contiuum from learning to identify numbers through pre-algebra, for math, and identifying letters to reading novels, for reading stuff.
Further, in the 6-9th grade levels, topics are gone into in more depth, but children are tested to determine aptitude and interest so that by 10th grade, they embark on a course of specialization, more similar to the European style.
Oh. And bring twice-a-day recess back. Our schools seem to be a training ground for future workaholics. Learning takes place in a variety of formats, including unstructured playtime.
I am finding the absolute most difficult aspect of parenting is trying to help navigate a child who doesn’t fit neatly into pre-determined pigeonholes through the public school system.
January 8, 2007 at 2:04 pm
Lynn: Thanks for the hugs to Megs. I’ve been trying to figure out what to do for her ever since the beginning of the school year. If moving back to M’boro doesn’t do it, I’ll figure something else out. I am not going to let my daughter get burnt out by boredom and repetition like I did.
Anonymous: Is the school you went to the same way now?
Anne: I agree 100% with every word you said. I love your ideas, these are things I have not thought of before.
January 8, 2007 at 2:22 pm
Christmas break convinced me that few things are scarier than professional educators. No matter how good a teacher is, he or she is bound to get caught up in trends, and many of those trends will override individual common sense.
What you suggest is called “laning”(pronounced “lane-ing”, and has been very popular in many school systems across the country. For the two years I was in public school I went to a “laned” school.
Recently the trend in educational thought (mom, sister, and sister-in-law are all schoolteachers and we talked this out over Xmas) is that lane-ing is bad because it amounts to a form of racial segregation. At least that’s what they’ll tell you. I think, more importantly, the fact is that no elementary school teacher wants to get stuck with a roomful of the lower-laned kids. My sister has protested laning for years because as the newest kindergarten teacher she would be forced to have 32 students a day who were far below the curve. With No Child Left Behind that means that her job would be in jeopardy if she couldn’t get those kids to test at a high enough level.
In short, you can thank politics and the teachers’ union for a situation where children’s actual learning ability has nothing to do with the type of education they receive.
January 8, 2007 at 2:28 pm
Go to:
http://www.lexington1.net/?page=DISTRICTINFO/straplan/strategicplan.htm
I am not saying that they have THE way to learn - we were all in the same class together - but had different groups within the classes or went different places throughout the day according to our levels. I still keep up with some of my HS friends. I think it made a real difference in our ability to learn and love of learning.
January 8, 2007 at 3:56 pm
Ivy, I teach 1st grade in Wilson Co. We test our kids every nine weeks for reading groups. They are grouped according to reading levels and can change their group whenever(even in the middle of the 9 weeks if it is determined they need to change) they need too. They can go either way too. Up if they grow that way or down if they struggle where they are. We don’t group for math in K-1, but they start doing it in 2nd. I think the thinking behind not doing it in K-1 is b/c it is really a foundation and they really start to separate themselves closer to the end of the year for us. I’ve seen a few kids go to another grade for reading or math if they need it. I have a student this year who goes to 2nd grade for math b/c he came to us when he was in K for math. They continue to group the kids by ability levels as they go through elementary. Couldn’t tell you what they do after they leave us though. I’d hope they continue to do it.
As for the extra classes. I wish we could do it too. We have our support classes (music, library,PE, and art), but I wish they could choose a language or computer class. That is all money. There is none so we are told.
January 8, 2007 at 4:04 pm
Anonymous- thanks for the link.
Paige- I bet it really pisses you off that they say there’s no money. I know it pisses me off. With as much money that flows in and out of our government on the federal, state, and local level, there absolutely should be enough money for education. As a matter of fact, it should be our #1 priority- *before* the military, *before* health care- before everything else. Educate the people and much poverty will be reduced, there will be less need for many of the social programs that exist.
And I call myself a liberal, ha ha ha.
January 8, 2007 at 4:09 pm
Okay, sorry. I had more to add. Two munchkins running around distracted me. LOL
Parent involvement is a pretty big issue in most schools. It seems that the poorer schools/areas have more of a problem (our school doesn’t have this problem often). Some of the problems I run into are that even though the parents want to help at school and are insistent about where their kids are placed, they don’t offer the support in the area of discipline. They tend to side with the kids over another adult in most situations. I remember when I was in school if I got in trouble at school I got in trouble at home. There was no “blaming” the teacher or other kids. That is rarely the case these days. It makes classroom management much more difficult.
I won’t get into my thoughts on No Child Left Behind. That would make this post way too long! LOL
January 8, 2007 at 4:15 pm
Ivy, it really does piss me off that they say there is no money. It seems that education is the lowest on the priority list and that is scary. We are educating the future of our country and it doesn’t seem to matter to the leaders of today. Sad! I wouldn’t even complain about our salaries if they would just give us the money we need to do our jobs. KWIM? I do this b/c I love kids and I have something to offer these them. I definitely don’t do it for the money and neither do most teachers you meet. I know that not many people with college degrees would work for what we do. Heck I have 2 degrees and I do it for the love of the kids. I just get so angry when they don’t give us the tools to help these kids be successful.
January 8, 2007 at 10:18 pm
The schools here have Creoce..where they go “work” and “learn” occupations. At least they did over 10 years ago. Jimmy went to Creoce on automobile stuff. There was also Creoce stuff for hair dressers, nursing, etc.
January 10, 2007 at 5:05 pm
I have similar problems. I too, am honest about my kids’ intelligence level. DS is extremely intelligent…but he does terrible in school, behaves horrendously, and hates it with a passion. The child refuses to read. Gimme a break. It breaks my heart because his current teacher thinks he’s some dumb kid who has bad parents…yet he’s extremely smart, and just needs to learn differently.
School sucks. I wish I could afford private school, or was able to homeschool (able, as in…had the patience and brain for).
OH…and I can attest to how smart Megs is…I first met her when she was what…9 months old? The kid was smart then. Freaky smart!